« Intelligence Officers: Need a Job? | Main | Uncle J on CNN's This Week at War- There I was.... »
Maverick gooses it on Gitmo
OK the title was me indulging me. I used to love being in a Navy pilot bar and then starting to tell stories with the hands showing how I would get on their 6 and take 'em out in a 4 g negative dive, oh yeah did I mention we were inverted. Now eventually real pilots would start to get chafed so I would end by asking the ladies what their favorite part of Top Gun was. When they predictably answered "When Mav threw Goose's dog tags in the ocean" I would say yeah that was all right but, and then I would imitate Goose mashing the canopy and hanging limp in the harness. A laugh riot I tell you. I am gonna burn in Hell huh?
Speaking of navy fighter pilots, what is wrong with John McCain? Every time I try to cut him some slack he pulls another "throw the other team a bone" stunts. Now he says he would close Gitmo and bring the detainees to say, Leavenworth. Why? That is the question here, why would we grant the left their bone of contention and offer them the argument that we closed it because it was somehow outside of the law. We gain nothing I can see other than proof to the left and the rest of the concerned world community that they can override US law, custom and even our Constitution if they wail and moan long enough.
I am working on the CNN video, I have it on a Tivo that won't give it to my computer. Pause to curse parasitic corporate subscription-based business models. I have posted the transcript after the end of this piece. I scored with the sniper video shot.
We can always bring the detainees to America if there was somehow an advantage to doing so, but I surely don't see one. If obtaining the approval of the UN, the Euros and other great humanitarians was possible or desirable there might be justification. But this would just be seen as capitulation and would lead to calls for more international control over the rampaging Americans. I can't see anything but bad in that.
If we close Gitmo we also pull back from the only in the face assertion of our right to house bad guys in facilities overseas that come under little or no oversight outside the executive. After the exposure of some CIA detention facilities overseas, and the consequent damage to relations with several good allies, we had to determine how we would handle our ongoing need to secure serious baddies a la KSM. Turns out we just moved some pieces around the board and "same as it ever was", but those are secret, Gitmo is right there in the Caribbean in Cuba even sweeter.
What they need to do is get the damn tribunal system running and process everybody at Gitmo. If they are enemy combatants they get life and one review by US Federal Court, then uh buh bye. Anyone not meeting that standard gets shipped wherever home is with apologies if deserved. Then we shut the place to the public, just like that. We have been more than open about allowing the Red Cross and every other flavor of NGO and Congressman and all to roam about looking for things to whine about. Let's give all of 'em their moment in front of a judge and be done with it. Nothing to see here, just some jihadis getting old and fat, move along.
CNN This Week at War transcript (I fixed a couple of errors with the names)
FOREMAN: In war, the first casualty is the truth. A quotation that's
said so often, we can't figure out who said it first. This week in
Washington the question was, who was not telling the truth, and why?
We now know that Private Jessica Lynch wasn't fighting to the death,
and that Corporal Pat Tillman was tragically killed by American
gunfire. That wasn't what we were told at first. How much was the fog
of war and how much was cynical deception?
Senior Pentagon
Correspondent Jamie McIntyre has covered the Tillman and Lynch stories.
And from Madison, Wisconsin, Jim Hanson, a retired Special Forces
Sergeant, who writes a popular military blog at black5.net.
Pat Tillman's brother, Kevin, who served in his brother's unit, spoke
Tuesday at a Congressional hearing of the circumstances surrounding his
death.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
KEVIN TILLMAN,
BROTHER OF CPL. PAT TILLMAN: We believe it shifted the focus from the
grotesque torture at Abu Ghraib and, in a downward spiral, of an
illegal act of aggression to a great American who died a hero's death.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
FOREMAN: Jamie McIntyre, how did it possibly come to this for the Pentagon?
JAMIE MCINTYRE, SENIOR PENTAGON CORRESPONDENT: One of the things about
this investigation is despite poor investigations, they still haven't
answered that key question. What was the motive behind the lie about
Pat Tillman's death?
We don't have any evidence it was part
of a P.R. campaign. But on the other hand, we don't have the
explanation for who actually came up with the cover story, because all
of the investigations make it clear that everyone up the chain of
command knew pretty much from the very beginning this was a
friendly-fire death, not a death from hostile fire.
FOREMAN: Jim Hanson, it certainly looks like a P.R. move. Why should we not use that as the default position here?
JIM HANSON, WRITER, BLACKFIVE.NET MILITARY BLOG: I wouldn't disagree that
it is a P.R. move. I think when Pat Tillman decided to take off his
Arizona Cardinal's helmet and put on a Kevlar, he gave a tremendous
gift both to the military and to the country as a whole. It was a boost
to the morale of everyone.
I think when his death happened,
and the Rangers there on the ground looked at the fact that this was
potentially going to tarnish that tremendous gift and that tremendous
P.R., you know, upside, that they made a tremendously bad decision and
decided to not tell the truth.
It was an awful choice. But I think that probably was the reasoning behind it.
FOREMAN: Jamie, have the right people been held accountable yet? I'm
not sure they can't be if we don't know who is involved.
MCINTYRE: Nine different officers have been held accountable, four
generals included, all different kinds of things. Who wrote the Silver
Star citation which really embodies the lie about what happened to Pat
Tillman that day? That is an official document.
It was sort
of written by committee, everybody who had a part of it disavows the
part that's inaccurate. And despite four separate investigations we
don't know who created the lie.
FOREMAN: This isn't just a
standalone incident. Let's listen to what Lynch said in her testimony
about again a manipulation of information seemingly for propaganda
purposes.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
JESSICA LYNCH,
PRIVATE, FORMER POW: I have repeatedly said when asked that if the
stories about me helped inspire our troops and rally a nation, then
perhaps there was some good. However, I'm still confused as to why they
chose to lie and try to make me a legend, when the real heroes of my
fellow soldiers that day were legendary.
FOREMAN: Jim, don't
you think that in many ways this really does demean the real heroics
and the people who do tremendous work out there, that anybody in the
Pentagon let these stories move forward that way, when they weren't
sure?
HANSON: I think you're looking at two completely
different situations. The Pat Tillman situation was quite obviously a
cover-up of a friendly fire incident.
The Jessica Lynch
situation was more of what you'd call the fog of war. When that
situation, when the ambush happened and she was knocked unconscious,
the initial reports probably from her unit, somebody tipped "The
Washington Post" that she had been shot, that she had fought heroically
and been captured.
That information was denied by the army spokesmen at the time. They caveated and said we have no confirmation of that.
So I'm unaware of any official military releases stating that the whole
hero story was true. I think what happened was "The Washington Post"
wrote their story and the rest of the media picked it up in a feeding
frenzy.
FOREMAN: I can buy that to some extent. But at the
same time, Jamie, the people who are going to for information about
this we all know when somebody says I can't confirm that's true, that's
a way of not saying anything about it as opposed to saying actively we
don't believe that's true.
MCINTYRE: I think Jim's got it
about right. The Pat Tillman case was definitely the army putting out
intentionally false information.
The Jessica Lynch case,
completely different. It appears that a source was confused about some
real heroics by somebody else on the battlefield, thought that was
Jessica Lynch and "The Washington Post" failed to follow up their own
report because, as Jim said, it was obvious the day the story was in
the paper that the facts weren't there to back it up.
The
story got out ahead of the ability of the army to catch up. Have very
different case, the Tillman case and the Lynch case.
FOREMAN: Let me ask you quickly, Jim, there's been a lot made of the
media improvements by the insurgents, that they're doing a great job of
getting their message out. What are we going to see from our military
as we move forward against that press machine, when they try to balance
it?
HANSON: You make a good point. you forced me to point
out you guys did put out a pretty heinous video of snipers, of the
insurgents killing U.S. troops on CNN, so you guys to some extent
helped them with their own propaganda.
Now the U.S. has never been good at information warfare. It's probably the weakest part of our military toolbox.
And another difficulty is any time the military gets involved in trying
to change the information war, it becomes a question of, is this
propaganda and is this a proper thing for the defense department or
military to be doing to attempt to change the information scene in the
way the information is put out?
I think there's a difficulty
in doing it. It should be our biggest focus. We should be carpet
bombing the Middle East with iPods full of good things about America
and positive aspects that we are doing for their cultures, and we do a
terrible job of it.
FOREMAN: Jim Hanson, we have to leave it
at that. People can check out your website for more news. Jamie
McIntyre will stay with us.

April 29, 2007 • Permalink
• Technorati Links
Technorati Tags:
Comments
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfadb53ef00d835142cc669e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Maverick gooses it on Gitmo:
































